Efficacy of Infliximab after Failure of Subcutaneous Anti-TNF Agents in Patients with Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis

Aim: To assess the efficacy of infliximab in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients who had failed therapy with adalimumab or golimumab. Methods: Retrospective analysis of prospectively acquired data of all anti-TNF naive patients with moderate to severe UC who received adalimumab or golimumab in 4 tertiary referral centres. Patients with primary non response or secondary loss of response to adalimumab or golimumab received therapy with infliximab. Clinical response and remission rates were assessed at week 14 and 54 after initiation of infliximab. Results: Between September 2015 and September 2017, 29 of 58 (50%) anti-TNF naive patients with moderate to severe UC failed therapy with adalimumab (n=38) or golimumab (n=20). Twenty one of 29 (72.4%) patients were primary non responders and 8 (27.6%) patients lost response to adalimumab or golimumab. All these 29 patients received infliximab, while 15 (51.7%) were on concomitant azathioprine therapy. Eighteen (62.1%) and 10 (34.5%) patients showed clinical response and clinical remission at week 14 respectively, while 14 (48.3%) patients were on clinical remission at week 54 after initiation of infliximab. Azathioprine co-administration at the start of infliximab was associated with a greater proportion of patients achieving clinical remission at week 54 (10 of 15 patients on combination therapy vs 4 of 14 patients on infliximab monotherapy, p=0.04). Conclusions: A significant proportion of anti-TNF naive patients with moderate to severe UC who have failed 1st course therapy with subcutaneous anti-TNF agents can achieve clinical response and/or remission with 2nd course therapy with infliximab

Effectiveness and Safety of Vedolizumab in Anti-TNF-Naive Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease-A Multicenter Retrospective European Study

Background: Vedolizumab (VDZ) is effective for treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). In GEMINI trials, anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF)-naïve patients had a superior response compared with anti-TNF-exposed patients. In real-world experience (RWE), the number of included anti-TNF-naïve patients was low. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of VDZ in anti-TNF-naïve patients in an RWE setting. Methods: This retrospective multicenter European pooled cohort study included consecutive active anti-TNF-naïve IBD patients treated with VDZ. The primary end point was clinical response at week 14. Patients with follow-up beyond week 14 and those discontinuing VDZ at any time were included for maintenance outcomes analysis. Results: Since January 2015, 184 anti-TNF-naïve patients from 23 centers initiated VDZ treatment (Crohn's disease [CD], 50; ulcerative colitis [UC], 134). In CD, 42/50 (82%) patients responded by week 14 and 32 (64%) were in clinical remission; 26/50 (52%) achieved corticosteroid-free remission (CSFR). At last follow-up (44 weeks; interquartile range [IQR], 30-52 weeks), 27/35 (77.1%) patients with available data responded to treatment; 24/35 (68.6%) were in clinical remission, 21/35 (60%) were in CSFR. For UC, 116/134 (79.1%) responded to treatment by week 14, including 53 (39.5%) in clinical remission; 49/134 (36.6%) achieved CSFR. At last follow-up (42.5 weeks; IQR, 30-52 weeks), 79/103 (76.7%) patients responded to treatment, 69/103 (67.0%) were in remission, and 61/103 (59.2%) were in CSFR. Adverse effects were reported in 20 (11%) of the patients, leading to treatment discontinuation in 6 (3.3%). Conclusions: VDZ is similarly effective in ant-TNF-naïve CD and UC patients. The efficacy is higher than reported in anti-TNF-experienced patients and is comparable to that of anti-TNF biologics in this population.status: publishe